|  "Facts 
            are the most fascinating things in the world” (Molière)
 
 THE MOST ANCIENT WRITTEN RECORDS
 
 (Out of the book: Csaba Varga “Signs, Letters, Alphabets”)
 
 Ordering the book possible in US or UK: 
            
            www.createspace.com/3389848
   
            This slab below can be 
            seen in the Pont d’Arc cave-museum and is approx. 30.000 years old. 
            (The paintings and other objects found in the cave are estimated to 
            be 35-30.000 years old. They might be older; however, it is quite 
            sure that they are not less than 30.000 as afterwards no man had set 
            foot in the cave prior to the moment of its discovery. This way, 
            statistically speaking the slab “turns out to be” 32.500 years of 
            age, but to be careful I will say the find is 30.000 years old)
 
 
   
             The slab of Pont d’Arc. 
            Most of the signs written on it are still exactly recognizable.
 
            It is without doubt that 
            it was a human to carve those signs on the stone – they cannot be 
            accidental scratches, or heaven forbid, impressions of seashells. 
            There should be one person in front of our eyes who is sitting down 
            to some comfortable place and starts thinking. The arcs and the 
            firmly drawn lines all suggest that their designer was experienced 
            indeed in activities of the kind. The scribe did not put down a 
            coherent text but was simply experimenting with the characters. 
            On the weather-beaten 
            stone only the ligatures below are totally identifiable: 
             
            Let me enumerate below 
            the signs of the ligatures and the individual signs: 
             
            I only took into 
            consideration the signs that are clearly identifiable. 
             
            According to the above 
            connotations, the meaning of the ligature is the following: 
             
            This is unquestionably 
            the conceptualization of a philosophical world-view. My solution 
            cannot be far from the truth, although there is no evidence that 
            thesesigns meant the same back then.
 
            * * * 
            The painting and the 
            text written on the bison were made around 20.000 BC, and found in 
            the cave of Pech Merle in today’s Southern France. 
             
            As a first step, the 
            signs need to be cleaned from their stylistic marks. The slightly 
            curved lines of the two middle signs can easily be straightened as 
            they would only make a meaningful difference in case of carefully 
            applied styling and not in a casual hand. The ornamentation of the 
            line-endings hardly performs any phonetic role. This act of cleaning 
            is shown in the figure below: 
             
            Of the signs I need to 
            explain only the “hand” character – or geometrically speaking the 
            “comb-hand” –. I present a couple of examples to show just how often 
            this character had already appeared in a variety of texts 10-18.000 
            years earlier: 
             This is a Portuguese, 12-14.000-yearold character.
 The “comb” is the same as the one on the bison;
 even the strong emphasis on the thumb is there.
 
             Drawn and the cuneiform 
            versions of an
 approx. 5.000-year-old (or older) Sumerian
 sign. It represents a word and a syllable
 sign here. And its meaning: “su” = hand.
 
             An ancient Greek sign 
            representing the
 “no” syllable. (It is a mystery why the
 direction of the hand is reversed. Other
 places the thumb points to the left)
 
              
              
                
                  | 
            ai 
                  se |  |  
            Two Cyprian syllabic 
            signs from 4.000 years earlier. 
            
 
  
 A collection of signs from various places.
 All of these signs had been writing signs, of course.
 
            These series of 
            remarkable concurrence of different times and places (I could 
            present a number of other instances too) can only be explained in 
            one way: in the ancient “comb” sign people had always “visioned” the 
            human hand. 
            We could 13 signs 
            encounter, which are 30.000 or more years old. Those signs were 
            present in the old but still used “alphabet” of the Carpathian Basin 
            6-8000BC, the Old-Egyptian Demotic, Aramaic, old Hebrew, all Greek 
            variations and finally in the early Latin alphabet. Etruscan and 
            Latin used only 18 letters, not much more, as the early ancestors. 
            Sumerians used those signs making ligatures to write their syllables, 
            but the early Sumerian signs looked just like them. 
 See more finds and further explanations in the book “Signs – 
            Letters - Alphabets” by Csaba Varga.
 
              
            
             
            The letter collection (LC)
 Signs collected from different artifacts of the last 35.000 years.
 
            * * * 
             Found 
            in Mas’d Azil. * * * 
             Signs 
            of the old-Egyptian demotic alphabet. * * * 
              
              
                
                  | 
             | 
            The 
            “ancient Hungarian” attributive in the enumeration left is confusing.  
            Generally, early records refer to this alphabet as Szekely-Hungarian,  
            Hunnish-Szekely, Hunnish-Szekely-Hungarian, Hunnish-Scythian.
 As this alphabet is fashioned to fit the Hungarian language, just 
            like the 
            Ancient Greek alphabet fits the Greek-, the Aramaic alphabet the 
            Aramaic-,
            and the Latin alphabet the Latin language, it is reasonable that 
            instead of the many kinds of old definitions, I call the alphabet 
            fashioned for the Hungarian language the “Hungarian alphabet.” 
            The more so because the modern Latin alphabet used in Hungary today,
            is quite a latecomer in Hungarian history.
 
            With this name-simplification I also want to stress that in this 
            book the
            political maps and the present day-centered approach were given no 
            role. 
            From the signs of the enumerated four alphabets at the left I 
            mainly
            Consider those that appear at least in two alphabets. With a couple 
            of exceptions. |  
            
            
  The 
            above series comes together after the contraction of the four 
            alphabets:
 This is the Hypothetic alphabet, the HA, and from now on I will 
            correlate all
 newly found signs with the above.
 Anima 
      Könyv:Signs-Letter-Alphabets
   |